Morphology in Pidgins and Creoles
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Paradigmatic complexity in pidgins and creoles
The last decade has seen increasing attention paid to questions of grammatical complexity, in particular regarding the extent to which some languages can be said to be more “complex” than others, whether globally or with respect to particular subsystems. Creoles have featured prominently in these debates, with various authors arguing that they are particularly simple when set against noncreoles...
متن کاملSimplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins: What’s the Metric?
This review article is a response to the way the editors of and contributors to Simplicity and Complexity in Creoles and Pidgins respond to McWhorter’s (2001) claim that creoles have the world’s simplest grammars. Although I agree with the contributors that creoles are not as simple as they may look to some, I express several concerns about the ways they (fail to) raise and/or address some fund...
متن کاملYou calls it jannying, we calls it mummering – but what do they call it? New and old constraints on verbal -s
The variable realisation of verbal -s has been investigated in a large number of English varieties, including traditional dialects as well as pidgins and creoles (see Clarke 1997 and van Herk & Walker 2005 for literature reviews). Its use is commonly associated with habituality, contrasting with the non-habitual bare form. However, a number of syntactic constraints, chiefly among them the North...
متن کاملSocial evolution and language change
We propose substantive universals in the relationship between social evolution and language change. Social anthropologists have categorized societies into roughly four broad types by social organization: bands, tribes, chiefdoms and states. This classification is evolutionary in the sense that the society types arose in human history in the sequence given above. We compare these society types t...
متن کاملRetained inflectional morphology in pidgins: A typological study
It is commonly accepted that the process of pidginization leads to a loss of inflectional morphology, but this loss is often not total. Lexifier inflections instead follow a cline of reduction: full retention – partial retention – partial lexicalization – full lexicalization – full loss. This article examines the retention of inflection in 29 languages that reflect a history of pidginization in...
متن کامل